Aircraft use more fuel than cars and produces more pollution. Some people suggest the non essential use of aircraft like international travel should be discouraged. Do you agree or disagree?
Sample Answer:
In today’s world, the issue of environmental sustainability has become increasingly important, and the impact of air travel on the environment is a topic of much debate. While it is true that aircraft use more fuel than cars and produce more pollution, I believe that the non-essential use of aircraft, such as international travel, should not be discouraged.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the significant environmental impact of air travel. The aviation industry is a major contributor to global carbon emissions and air pollution, and reducing the non-essential use of aircraft could help mitigate these impacts. However, it is also important to consider the economic and social benefits of international travel. For many people, international travel is a way to experience new cultures, broaden their horizons, and build connections with people from around the world. It also plays a crucial role in the global economy, facilitating trade, tourism, and international cooperation.
Instead of discouraging non-essential air travel, I believe that a more balanced approach is needed. Governments and the aviation industry should focus on developing and promoting sustainable aviation technologies, such as biofuels and electric aircraft, to reduce the environmental impact of air travel. Additionally, measures such as carbon offsetting and investment in carbon capture and storage technologies can help mitigate the environmental impact of air travel.
In conclusion, while it is important to address the environmental impact of air travel, I do not believe that the non-essential use of aircraft, such as international travel, should be discouraged. Instead, efforts should be focused on developing sustainable aviation technologies and implementing measures to mitigate the environmental impact of air travel.
Be First to Comment