Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Answer:
The rise of supermarkets has undoubtedly had a significant impact on small, local businesses in many countries. While some argue that the closure of these local establishments will lead to the demise of local communities, I believe that there are other factors at play that can help these communities thrive.
Firstly, it is undeniable that the closure of local businesses can have a negative impact on the sense of community in a particular area. Local businesses often serve as gathering places for residents, and their closure can lead to a loss of social interaction and a decrease in community cohesion. Additionally, the disappearance of these businesses can also lead to a loss of unique products and services that are often not available in supermarkets, further diminishing the character and identity of a community.
However, it is important to note that the development of supermarkets also brings about several benefits for local communities. Supermarkets often provide a wider range of products at competitive prices, making them more accessible to a larger portion of the population. Additionally, supermarkets are often able to create more job opportunities, which can benefit the local economy and provide employment for residents.
In conclusion, while the closure of local businesses due to the expansion of supermarkets may have some negative effects on local communities, it is not necessarily the death knell for these areas. With proper support and adaptation, local communities can continue to thrive and maintain their unique character in the face of changing economic landscapes.
Be First to Comment